Multi-Role Ocean Surveillance Ships
Multi-Role Ocean Surveillance Ships
Ok, this is the second time these have been referred to by 1SL (6:11), the first being his Christmas/New Year video. Meanwhile no mention of the Multi-Role Research Vessel touted in the Nov 19 PM's announcement.
So it appears the plan may have changed. Or not. Who knows?
Maybe the Integrated Review will shed some light.
Re: Multi-Role Ocean Surveillance Ships
The global role of the two Echos is still there. I hope this is a signal of a small fleet, especially with a degree of strengthen hull for artic operations there is an argument for 1/2 dozen, to complement the other UUV/USV capabilities of the planned T26/T31/T32 platforms.
”We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow." - Lord Palmerston
- ArmChairCivvy
- Senior Member
- Posts: 16312
- Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
Re: Multi-Role Ocean Surveillance Ships
Let's also remember - until we get any of the new 'researh' ships - that the secondary role for the Echos is a command function for MCM fleetsRepulse wrote:to complement the other UUV/USV capabilities of the planned T26/T31/T32 platforms.
- with the rumoured demise of the dedicated two MCM classes of vessels, that command role might even be elevated. Even if the actual 'worker bees' are to be launched from other vessels
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
- ArmChairCivvy
- Senior Member
- Posts: 16312
- Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
Re: Multi-Role Ocean Surveillance Ships
And an update from Downunder popped up:
If you don't use other vessels to launch the remote/ autonomous worker bees, then our 2 is nowhere near enough. Australia planning 8.Mercator wrote: a new hydrographic capability,” Minister Reynolds said.
“These vessels will help Navy navigate more confidently throughout the region, and safely clear minefields with the use of autonomous technologies.”
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
Re: Multi-Role Ocean Surveillance Ships
AndyC wrote:Most likely a replacement for Scott.
This seems to be separate from Type 32 and Navy Lookout indicated they are indeed a replacement for Scott. But no citation.Pseudo wrote:Do I hear anyone whispering the words Type 32?
https://www.navylookout.com/a-year-in-r ... y-in-2020/
Two hydrographic vessels will be purchased to replace HMS Scott, but with additional capabilities to monitor and protect undersea cables.
- Tempest414
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5631
- Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 23:39
Re: Multi-Role Ocean Surveillance Ships
For me the little nugget was shipping to support future RM at around 6.20 in
- ArmChairCivvy
- Senior Member
- Posts: 16312
- Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
Re: Multi-Role Ocean Surveillance Ships
Oohh... a multi-role frigate!
@Mercator had picked up that the ozzie thing will be of OPV shape; don't know from where as the article linked on that thread didn't say so
- nevertheless, great minds think alike
Of course Scott is a rather massive thing; does anyone know why exactly? Ie. will those reasons persist into the future
- the closest benchmark might be the Yantar, the lead vessel of project 22010 with a displacement of 5200 tons... undersea cables and all that
@Mercator had picked up that the ozzie thing will be of OPV shape; don't know from where as the article linked on that thread didn't say so
- nevertheless, great minds think alike
![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_e_wink.gif)
Of course Scott is a rather massive thing; does anyone know why exactly? Ie. will those reasons persist into the future
- the closest benchmark might be the Yantar, the lead vessel of project 22010 with a displacement of 5200 tons... undersea cables and all that
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
Re: Multi-Role Ocean Surveillance Ships
"My second announcement is that the Government has made a decision to build a variant of the offshore patrol vessel for the new Mine Countermeasures and also our new Hydrographic vessels. This commitment boosts our election commitment from three vessels now to eight. And this is an investment, an additional investment, of up to $5 billion in the build..."ArmChairCivvy wrote:Oohh... a multi-role frigate!
@Mercator had picked up that the ozzie thing will be of OPV shape; don't know from where as the article linked on that thread didn't say so...
https://www.minister.defence.gov.au/min ... al-base-wa
- ArmChairCivvy
- Senior Member
- Posts: 16312
- Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
Re: Multi-Role Ocean Surveillance Ships
Thx, interesting.
24 (local) bns over two decades just into naval weapons, more to follow in announcements for land based ones.
And that the Anzacs will be the first to get them; is there space after the ESSM upgrade?
Also, l-w torps. The 'euro'-torp is already quite old, so will this be the one from Saab? Which would mean attention being paid to engaging in the littoral(s)
24 (local) bns over two decades just into naval weapons, more to follow in announcements for land based ones.
And that the Anzacs will be the first to get them; is there space after the ESSM upgrade?
Also, l-w torps. The 'euro'-torp is already quite old, so will this be the one from Saab? Which would mean attention being paid to engaging in the littoral(s)
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
Re: Multi-Role Ocean Surveillance Ships
The threat to world’s communications backbone – the vulnerability of undersea cables
https://www.navylookout.com/the-threat- ... ea-cables/
![Image](https://www.navylookout.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/BELGOROD-KC-139-Submarine-2.jpg)
![Image](https://www.navylookout.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Yantar-Submersible.jpg)
https://www.navylookout.com/the-threat- ... ea-cables/
![Image](https://www.navylookout.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/BELGOROD-KC-139-Submarine-2.jpg)
![Image](https://www.navylookout.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Yantar-Submersible.jpg)
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4107
- Joined: 15 Dec 2017, 10:25
Re: Multi-Role Ocean Surveillance Ships
A few snippets here:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/20 ... -russians/
Seems a tad ambitious.....
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/20 ... -russians/
"Due in service by 2024, the Multi Role Ocean Surveillance ship (MROSS) will help protect critical national infrastructure such as undersea cables which carry trillions of dollars of financial transfers each day and transmit 97 per cent of the world’s global communications.
The MROSS is likely to operate a towed-array sonar cable and underwater drones to search for submarines interfering with sea-bed cables."
In service by 2024? The MROSS is likely to operate a towed-array sonar cable and underwater drones to search for submarines interfering with sea-bed cables."
Seems a tad ambitious.....
- ArmChairCivvy
- Senior Member
- Posts: 16312
- Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
Re: Multi-Role Ocean Surveillance Ships
Moon pools and any such are now std in ship building. And not many off-shore support vessels are being ordered, so... it is really just down to getting the kit to put onto these shipsPoiuytrewq wrote: In service by 2024?
Seems a tad ambitious.....
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4107
- Joined: 15 Dec 2017, 10:25
Re: Multi-Role Ocean Surveillance Ships
A conversion would be entirely possible in that time frame but from ordering to commissioning in 3 years for a purpose built vessel seems tight.ArmChairCivvy wrote:Moon pools and any such are now std in ship building. And not many off-shore support vessels are being ordered, so... it is really just down to getting the kit to put onto these ships
RRS Sir David Attenborough took 4 years from first steel cut to handing over.
Re: Multi-Role Ocean Surveillance Ships
Yes - for this time-frame, it's likely to be an existing design with minor changes for the specifc role. My money would be on a follow-on order for an RRS-type hull (or two), with some changes to allow for towed arrays and additional off-board systems and the lab space being re-purposed for control consoles for the same off-board systems. Not sure what they'll use the 5000t hold for, but I'm sure they can put it to good use (probaly not VLS silos, but that would be amusing).ArmChairCivvy wrote:Moon pools and any such are now std in ship building. And not many off-shore support vessels are being ordered, so... it is really just down to getting the kit to put onto these shipsPoiuytrewq wrote: In service by 2024?
Seems a tad ambitious.....
The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty.
Winston Churchill
Winston Churchill
- ArmChairCivvy
- Senior Member
- Posts: 16312
- Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
Re: Multi-Role Ocean Surveillance Ships
In that time you could have (and fit out) a dozen of these:Poiuytrewq wrote: RRS Sir David Attenborough took 4 years from first steel cut to handing over.
The 7000dwt Edda Fjord, which reports said cost NOK340 million, is 98.2m long and 22m wide and is well equipped for ocean and deep water service.
The above was my first stab at the likely design, and if there is any veracity to the 'reports' about the Swire Offshore vessel coming in (as a stop-gap?) then it would not be far off:
PACIFIC CONSTRUCTOR
Length overall: 115.40 mLength between P.P.: 108.25 mBreadth:22.00 Gross tonnage:7888
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
Re: Multi-Role Ocean Surveillance Ships
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56472655
“Staffed by 15” - I assume they mean crewed. Question would be is this a RN, RFA or Serco (outsourced) ship. Given the sensitive nature of the role and kit, would assume RN.
15 is too few for a RRS Sir David Attenborough type ship (28 crew), closer to a SD Victoria / SD Northern River type ship.
Also, assume they will be going for a 3 section system.
“Staffed by 15” - I assume they mean crewed. Question would be is this a RN, RFA or Serco (outsourced) ship. Given the sensitive nature of the role and kit, would assume RN.
15 is too few for a RRS Sir David Attenborough type ship (28 crew), closer to a SD Victoria / SD Northern River type ship.
Also, assume they will be going for a 3 section system.
”We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow." - Lord Palmerston
-
- Member
- Posts: 527
- Joined: 09 May 2015, 22:54
Re: Multi-Role Ocean Surveillance Ships
please can I have my Ulstein SX119 now at last?
https://www.google.com/search?q=offshor ... kjOn5mYB5M
https://www.google.com/search?q=offshor ... kjOn5mYB5M
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4107
- Joined: 15 Dec 2017, 10:25
Re: Multi-Role Ocean Surveillance Ships
Why not have two?jedibeeftrix wrote:please can I have my Ulstein SX119 now at last?
https://www.google.com/search?q=offshor ... kjOn5mYB5M
"Multi role research vessels"
- ArmChairCivvy
- Senior Member
- Posts: 16312
- Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
Re: Multi-Role Ocean Surveillance Ships
Indeed, and looking further into what was happening in the OSV (construction) market in the decade that abruptly ended with Covid, traditional OSVs were finally leaving fleets after 30 -45 years of service, and smaller numbers of more advanced vessels were needed as offshore drilling and production shifts to increasingly deeper water.With the offshore standstill OSV fleets are oversupplied, but a lot of construction (and design, ehhm: Rolls Royce) capacity continues to exist.Repulse wrote:15 is too few for a RRS Sir David Attenborough type ship (28 crew), closer to a SD Victoria / SD Northern River type ship.
Deepwater-capable vessel designs have pioneered i.a. significant automation, flexibility of use, and redundant dynamic positioning systems.
For the deep sea cable operation/repair tech does exist, but I would expect a lot of Red Stamps on the spec of the kit that will be designed for/ fitted in these future vessels.
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
- ArmChairCivvy
- Senior Member
- Posts: 16312
- Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
Re: Multi-Role Ocean Surveillance Ships
The Kiwis were faster to the grey paint pot https://ostensjo.no/content/uploads/201 ... ington.jpgjedibeeftrix wrote:please can I have my Ulstein SX119 now at last?
https://www.google.com/search?q=offshor ... kjOn5mYB5M
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
- hovematlot
- Member
- Posts: 268
- Joined: 27 May 2015, 17:46
Re: Multi-Role Ocean Surveillance Ships
Just paint SD North River grey. Rename her HMS Challenger. Enhance her underwater capabilities. Job done.
Re: Multi-Role Ocean Surveillance Ships
The Sunday Times is also running the story but says the project is to be fast-tracked with expressions of interest sought "within weeks".
It's ambiguous about numbers and about the 15 crew (sorry not got a link - I borrowed one of those foldy things that leaves ink on your fingers).
Some time ago BMT were working on this. Advertised primarily for submarine rescue. But essentially something to carry and operate offboard submersibles and reach stuff at the bottom of the sea, with the obligatory reconfigurable mission bay
![Image](https://www.bmt.org/media/1661/salvas-moship_stern_lower-res-c-bmt-defence-services-2011.jpg?anchor=center&mode=crop&width=1200&height=630&rnd=131823479440000000)
It's ambiguous about numbers and about the 15 crew (sorry not got a link - I borrowed one of those foldy things that leaves ink on your fingers).
Some time ago BMT were working on this. Advertised primarily for submarine rescue. But essentially something to carry and operate offboard submersibles and reach stuff at the bottom of the sea, with the obligatory reconfigurable mission bay
![Image](https://www.bmt.org/media/1661/salvas-moship_stern_lower-res-c-bmt-defence-services-2011.jpg?anchor=center&mode=crop&width=1200&height=630&rnd=131823479440000000)