Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Contains threads on Royal Navy equipment of the past, present and future.
new guy
Senior Member
Posts: 1263
Joined: 18 Apr 2023, 01:53
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by new guy »

Pte. James Frazer wrote: 13 Nov 2023, 20:24 Mojave..?

Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk
what is that?

Pte. James Frazer
Member
Posts: 56
Joined: 13 Nov 2023, 20:12

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Pte. James Frazer »

General Atomics Mojave....STOL RPAS due for trials....crated on most likely as wouldn't fly on before....mmm..trials

Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk


new guy
Senior Member
Posts: 1263
Joined: 18 Apr 2023, 01:53
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by new guy »

Pte. James Frazer wrote: 13 Nov 2023, 22:21 General Atomics Mojave....STOL RPAS due for trials....crated on most likely as wouldn't fly on before....mmm..trials

Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk
sorry, didn't realise the end bit is an automated message, thought it was an additional point that you were trying to communicate.

Pte. James Frazer
Member
Posts: 56
Joined: 13 Nov 2023, 20:12

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Pte. James Frazer »

Not sure how to turn that off..yet

Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk


bobp
Senior Member
Posts: 2704
Joined: 06 May 2015, 07:52
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by bobp »

Pte. James Frazer wrote: 13 Nov 2023, 22:21 General Atomics Mojave....STOL RPAS due for trials....crated on most likely as wouldn't fly on before....mmm..trials

Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk
Is this fact or your imagination...?

Pte. James Frazer
Member
Posts: 56
Joined: 13 Nov 2023, 20:12

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Pte. James Frazer »

Speculation hence the question mark in my first post.....driven by the journalistic tease of the original @HMSPWLS tweet.

Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk


Pte. James Frazer
Member
Posts: 56
Joined: 13 Nov 2023, 20:12

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Pte. James Frazer »

Speculation hence the question mark of my first post...but, given that Mojave trials are imminent and F35 trials now complete, prompted by the journalistic tease of the original HMSPWLS tweet.

Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk

These users liked the author Pte. James Frazer for the post:
bobp

PhillyJ
Member
Posts: 745
Joined: 01 May 2015, 09:27
England

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by PhillyJ »

QNLZ sneaking in early tomorrow morning, that'll wake the neighbours. :shh:
Screenshot_20231114-122841.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
These users liked the author PhillyJ for the post (total 2):
bobpSKB

bobp
Senior Member
Posts: 2704
Joined: 06 May 2015, 07:52
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by bobp »

Pte. James Frazer wrote: 14 Nov 2023, 07:40 Speculation hence the question mark of my first post...but, given that Mojave trials are imminent and F35 trials now complete, prompted by the journalistic tease of the original HMSPWLS tweet.

Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk
I have read that the Mojave airframes will be tested on take off and only landing on the carrier if conditions are suitable, so I suspect your speculation is correct.
These users liked the author bobp for the post:
djkeos

bobp
Senior Member
Posts: 2704
Joined: 06 May 2015, 07:52
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by bobp »

Its hiding in the hangar....

These users liked the author bobp for the post (total 3):
Poiuytrewqnew guyleonard

Digger22
Member
Posts: 349
Joined: 27 May 2015, 16:47
England

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Digger22 »

Here's a question.
Is it time we dropped the F from CVF?
These users liked the author Digger22 for the post:
PhillyJ

new guy
Senior Member
Posts: 1263
Joined: 18 Apr 2023, 01:53
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by new guy »

Digger22 wrote: 14 Nov 2023, 20:05 Here's a question.
Is it time we dropped the F from CVF?
??

bobp
Senior Member
Posts: 2704
Joined: 06 May 2015, 07:52
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by bobp »

Meanwhile HMS QNLZ wraps up its deployment....


User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7950
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by SKB »

Digger22 wrote: 14 Nov 2023, 20:05 Here's a question. Is it time we dropped the F from CVF?
Yes, years ago. The F in CVF was an early 2010s acronym for CV "Future" when the QEC was a future project.
These users liked the author SKB for the post:
Digger22

User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7950
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by SKB »

Just had a peek into the naval base, QE is at PRJ now. She got in just after 00:30.
These users liked the author SKB for the post:
djkeos

PhillyJ
Member
Posts: 745
Joined: 01 May 2015, 09:27
England

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by PhillyJ »

Digger22 wrote: 14 Nov 2023, 20:05 Here's a question.
Is it time we dropped the F from CVF?
Nah, it's fun for people to be curious, just like, "why are they prefixed 'R'." :lol:
These users liked the author PhillyJ for the post:
Digger22

Scimitar54
Senior Member
Posts: 1717
Joined: 13 Jul 2015, 05:10
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Scimitar54 »

Perhaps the QEC (and Ford Class) could now best be described as CVEs as opposed to CVNs. :lol:

sol
Member
Posts: 562
Joined: 01 Jul 2021, 09:11
Bosnia & Herzegovina

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by sol »

These users liked the author sol for the post:
wargame_insomniac

SW1
Senior Member
Posts: 5805
Joined: 27 Aug 2018, 19:12
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by SW1 »



Online
Jdam
Member
Posts: 943
Joined: 09 May 2015, 22:26
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Jdam »

Your future ASaC there.

I wonder how much it was lightened as it just seemed to leap off the deck.
These users liked the author Jdam for the post:
new guy

User avatar
Tempest414
Senior Member
Posts: 5632
Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 23:39
France

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Tempest414 »

Looked to be off in a third of deck and landed back on in less than half for me this shows we need to push for through deck MRSS now to allow us to take this capability anywhere at any time
These users liked the author Tempest414 for the post:
Dahedd

Poiuytrewq
Senior Member
Posts: 4108
Joined: 15 Dec 2017, 10:25
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Poiuytrewq »

Impressive.

Now it needs to do it again fully loaded and at night to confirm but a 200m LPH looks like more than enough to handle that.

As expected the game just changed.

Bring Deeps
Donator
Posts: 220
Joined: 27 May 2015, 21:06
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Bring Deeps »

If this develops as everyone hopes then presumably we might see an angled flight deck added to the class as part of a major refit. That makes me slightly nervous after what happened to HMS Victorious. In that case the high costs of the refit were used to justify decommissioning the ship early.

Caribbean
Senior Member
Posts: 2822
Joined: 09 Jan 2016, 19:08
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Caribbean »

Poiuytrewq wrote: 17 Nov 2023, 11:48 Impressive.

Now it needs to do it again fully loaded and at night to confirm but a 200m LPH looks like more than enough to handle that.

As expected the game just changed.
Possibly less, if a lightweight catapult/ arrestor gear was installed as has been hinted at.
The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty.
Winston Churchill

Post Reply