Boeing RC-135W Airseeker/Rivet Joint (RAF)
Re: RC-135W Airseeker (ex 'Rivet Joint') (RAF)
That's nice revealing the capabilities, I hope our cousins across the pond aren't upset.
Re: RC-135W Airseeker (ex 'Rivet Joint') (RAF)
Caught a snippet on Radio 5 yesterday stating that a 2nd Airseeker/RJ was being deployed to the area to assist in operations vs ISIS.
Given its that "handy/popular" an aircraft would it be worth the UK trying to get a 4th?
Given its that "handy/popular" an aircraft would it be worth the UK trying to get a 4th?
-
- Member
- Posts: 273
- Joined: 19 Oct 2015, 18:29
Re: RC-135W Airseeker (ex 'Rivet Joint') (RAF)
Depends if there are any left in any museums anywhere.Dahedd wrote:Caught a snippet on Radio 5 yesterday stating that a 2nd Airseeker/RJ was being deployed to the area to assist in operations vs ISIS.
Given its that "handy/popular" an aircraft would it be worth the UK trying to get a 4th?
Re: RC-135W Airseeker (ex 'Rivet Joint') (RAF)
are they not converted tankers from the Bone Yard ?? Must be a few of them still kicking about.
Re: RC-135W Airseeker (ex 'Rivet Joint') (RAF)
Heh. The third and final Airseeker (expected in 2017) will carry the registry ZZ666 !
(The first two were ZZ664 and ZZ665)
(The first two were ZZ664 and ZZ665)
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4640
- Joined: 01 May 2015, 10:22
Re: RC-135W Airseeker (ex 'Rivet Joint') (RAF)
just a pity we didin't get the electronics fitted to the A330 not a 50 year old Museum piece!
- The Armchair Soldier
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1758
- Joined: 29 Apr 2015, 08:31
- Contact:
- GibMariner
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1351
- Joined: 12 May 2015, 14:17
Re: RC-135W Airseeker (ex 'Rivet Joint') (RAF)
The Armchair Soldier wrote:RAF looking to expand Rivet Joint and Shadow fleets?
- The Armchair Soldier
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1758
- Joined: 29 Apr 2015, 08:31
- Contact:
Re: RC-135W Airseeker (ex 'Rivet Joint') (RAF)
Thanks for the correction!GibMariner wrote:The Armchair Soldier wrote:RAF looking to expand Rivet Joint and Shadow fleets?
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4640
- Joined: 01 May 2015, 10:22
Re: RC-135W Airseeker (ex 'Rivet Joint') (RAF)
GibMariner wrote:The Armchair Soldier wrote:RAF looking to expand Rivet Joint and Shadow fleets?
Airseeker's are hardly "new" aircraft
Re: RC-135W Airseeker (ex 'Rivet Joint') (RAF)
Surprised that the Runway isn't long enough for a full fuel load take off.
Re: RC-135W Airseeker (ex 'Rivet Joint') (RAF)
Oh, joy. That is not a problem at all, with Voyager and its drogues... wait.
Can see why they don't like that. And they will like it even less when the US tankers leave the UK soil in the near future.
Can see why they don't like that. And they will like it even less when the US tankers leave the UK soil in the near future.
You might also know me as Liger30, from that great forum than MP.net was.
Arma Pacis Fulcra.
Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
Arma Pacis Fulcra.
Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1029
- Joined: 23 Jul 2016, 22:46
Re: RC-135W Airseeker (ex 'Rivet Joint') (RAF)
The full article (behind the paywall) speculates that the USAF might chose to base their RC-135s at RAF Fairford and, if so, the UK might move their RC-135s to Fairford as well.
- shark bait
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6427
- Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:18
Re: RC-135W Airseeker (ex 'Rivet Joint') (RAF)
This all sounds very bizarre, when I was at Waddington there was no mention of it being too short, but admittedly that was back in the Nimrod days.
Mildenhall is about the same size as Waddington so how come its all of a sudden a problem? Further more why would you close one base just to open another? Also surely its cheaper to extend a runway then activate a whole new base?
Mildenhall is about the same size as Waddington so how come its all of a sudden a problem? Further more why would you close one base just to open another? Also surely its cheaper to extend a runway then activate a whole new base?
@LandSharkUK
Re: RC-135W Airseeker (ex 'Rivet Joint') (RAF)
It'd be interesting to know why this sort of activity wasn't undertaken (if it was judged important enough) during the runway refurb work, the base was shut down and a/c operated from elsewhere I think.
- ArmChairCivvy
- Senior Member
- Posts: 16312
- Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
Re: RC-135W Airseeker (ex 'Rivet Joint') (RAF)
I can speculate:shark bait wrote:Further more why would you close one base just to open another? Also surely its cheaper to extend a runway then activate a whole new base?
1. Salford has two aircon hangars for the very delicate B2s; I can imagine that the use of them would be beneficial when the v sensitive - and when in use , sealed - electronics need to be opened up for maintenance
2. When you take off, seen from a certain angle and from a great distance the huge air traffic, including holding patterns over the SE acts as chaff against radars
Now, if I were the RAF, I would start to track all new house purchases within binocular range of the runways...
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
- The Armchair Soldier
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1758
- Joined: 29 Apr 2015, 08:31
- Contact:
Re: RC-135W Airseeker (ex 'Rivet Joint') (RAF)
If it doesn't get the callsign "Beast" on a regular basis, something is very wrong with you people.
You might also know me as Liger30, from that great forum than MP.net was.
Arma Pacis Fulcra.
Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
Arma Pacis Fulcra.
Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
-
- Retired Site Admin
- Posts: 2657
- Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:10
Re: RC-135W Airseeker (ex 'Rivet Joint') (RAF)
That one took me a second to spot, Gabe. Very good!
Also nice to see, for some reason I had it in my head it wasn't turning up till 2018.
Also nice to see, for some reason I had it in my head it wasn't turning up till 2018.
Re: RC-135W Airseeker (ex 'Rivet Joint') (RAF)
September 2017 had been the last i heard. Which might still be accurate if it refers to it being fully absorbed into operational cycle and all that... otherwise, it arrived earlier than expected, which is never a bad thing.
You might also know me as Liger30, from that great forum than MP.net was.
Arma Pacis Fulcra.
Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
Arma Pacis Fulcra.
Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
Re: RC-135W Airseeker (ex 'Rivet Joint') (RAF)
Gabriele wrote:If it doesn't get the callsign "Beast" on a regular basis, something is very wrong with you people.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/ ... ypus_4.jpg
Fortune favors brave sir, said Carrot cheerfully.
What's her position about heavily armed, well prepared and overmanned armies?
Oh, noone's ever heard of Fortune favoring them, sir.
According to General Tacticus, it's because they favor themselves…
What's her position about heavily armed, well prepared and overmanned armies?
Oh, noone's ever heard of Fortune favoring them, sir.
According to General Tacticus, it's because they favor themselves…
Re: Boeing RC-135W Airseeker (RAF)
And now formally delivered.Gabriele wrote:If it doesn't get the callsign "Beast" on a regular basis, something is very wrong with you people.
http://www.janes.com/article/74493/uk-r ... -airseeker
Might be the Beast, but Damien is the traditional nickname for the 666 plates, as 51 Sqn are well aware.......
Let's hope this has more luck than XW666.
Re: Boeing RC-135W Airseeker (RAF)
Google maps picture
Couple rivet joint,sentinel and shadow
Couple rivet joint,sentinel and shadow
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.