New Medium Helicopter [NMH] - (RAF & AAC)

Contains threads on Joint Service equipment of the past, present and future.

It's February 2024 - Which way is NMH going to go?

Please note that results are sorted by decreasing number of votes received.

Leonardo AW-149
11
61%
Sikorsky S-70M Black Hawk
4
22%
Programme cancelled
2
11%
Airbus H-175M
1
6%
Boeing MH-139 (back from the dead?)
0
No votes
Puma kept in service till next-gen
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 18

User avatar
Jensy
Moderator
Posts: 1091
Joined: 05 Aug 2016, 19:44
United Kingdom

Re: New Medium Helicopter [NMH] - (RAF & AAC)

Post by Jensy »

tomuk wrote: 26 Feb 2024, 00:07
Jensy wrote: 25 Feb 2024, 23:19
Ron5 wrote: 24 Feb 2024, 13:37
Jensy wrote: 23 Feb 2024, 11:16 Ignoring the platforms, and focusing purely on politics, my money's on Airbus. Should the programme go ahead before the election.
Why do you think that?
Alyn and Deeside is a far more marginal constituency than Yeovil.
It's had a Labour MP since it was created in 1983. Even if things got a bit dicey in 2019 at the height of Boris\Brexit mania I can't see how it could be considered a marginal now.
It's a long shot. Not denying that, but frankly Yeovil going Red is even more so. The Lib Dems seems to be fairly placid at the moment.. don't think we'll see another Clegg style upset.

As such, of the two potential manufacturing sites I'd say there's vastly more to be gained by going with Broughton. Were it not for the current low ebb of the Tories, the historical trend is definitely in their favour:

Image
"Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room!" - Dr. Strangelove (1964)

User avatar
Jensy
Moderator
Posts: 1091
Joined: 05 Aug 2016, 19:44
United Kingdom

Re: New Medium Helicopter [NMH] - (RAF & AAC)

Post by Jensy »

mrclark303 wrote: 26 Feb 2024, 13:51 Are we going to have a sweepstake.....
I'm still sticking with Leonardo's sacred Wasteland site will be secured at any cost....
I've added a (somewhat lighthearted) poll! Have fun. :D

P.S: Open to any obscure or mad suggestions people might like to add.

P.P.S: I've somehow managed to reset the poll by editing :oops: - The 149 was winning by a decent margin
These users liked the author Jensy for the post:
mrclark303
"Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room!" - Dr. Strangelove (1964)

User avatar
mrclark303
Donator
Posts: 849
Joined: 06 May 2015, 10:47
United Kingdom

Re: New Medium Helicopter [NMH] - (RAF & AAC)

Post by mrclark303 »

Jensy wrote: 26 Feb 2024, 14:54
mrclark303 wrote: 26 Feb 2024, 13:51 Are we going to have a sweepstake.....
I'm still sticking with Leonardo's sacred Wasteland site will be secured at any cost....
I've added a (somewhat lighthearted) poll! Have fun. :D

P.S: Open to any obscure or mad suggestions people might like to add.
It's currently 50/50%, I'm convinced it will be a purely political decision bent and forced by the military industrial complex, as per usual.

So Wastelands gets it, I will be astonished at any other decision.
These users liked the author mrclark303 for the post:
Jensy

tomuk
Senior Member
Posts: 1566
Joined: 20 Dec 2017, 20:24
United Kingdom

Re: New Medium Helicopter [NMH] - (RAF & AAC)

Post by tomuk »

Jensy wrote: 26 Feb 2024, 14:47
tomuk wrote: 26 Feb 2024, 00:07
Jensy wrote: 25 Feb 2024, 23:19
Ron5 wrote: 24 Feb 2024, 13:37
Jensy wrote: 23 Feb 2024, 11:16 Ignoring the platforms, and focusing purely on politics, my money's on Airbus. Should the programme go ahead before the election.
Why do you think that?
Alyn and Deeside is a far more marginal constituency than Yeovil.
It's had a Labour MP since it was created in 1983. Even if things got a bit dicey in 2019 at the height of Boris\Brexit mania I can't see how it could be considered a marginal now.
It's a long shot. Not denying that, but frankly Yeovil going Red is even more so. The Lib Dems seems to be fairly placid at the moment.. don't think we'll see another Clegg style upset.

As such, of the two potential manufacturing sites I'd say there's vastly more to be gained by going with Broughton. Were it not for the current low ebb of the Tories, the historical trend is definitely in their favour:

With current polls at 48% Labour, 24% Conservative with predictions of majorities of 280+. Building a couple of dozen helicopters at Broughton will swing the election?

Anyway won't jobs be safe in Broughton if they bring Peter Mandelson's Machine back on line.

These users liked the author tomuk for the post (total 2):
new guyJensy

new guy
Senior Member
Posts: 1263
Joined: 18 Apr 2023, 01:53
United Kingdom

Re: New Medium Helicopter [NMH] - (RAF & AAC)

Post by new guy »

Jensy wrote: 26 Feb 2024, 14:54
mrclark303 wrote: 26 Feb 2024, 13:51 Are we going to have a sweepstake.....
I'm still sticking with Leonardo's sacred Wasteland site will be secured at any cost....
I've added a (somewhat lighthearted) poll! Have fun. :D

P.S: Open to any obscure or mad suggestions people might like to add.
add FARA 😂
These users liked the author new guy for the post (total 2):
JensyLittle J

User avatar
Jensy
Moderator
Posts: 1091
Joined: 05 Aug 2016, 19:44
United Kingdom

Re: New Medium Helicopter [NMH] - (RAF & AAC)

Post by Jensy »

new guy wrote: 26 Feb 2024, 16:01
Jensy wrote: 26 Feb 2024, 14:54
mrclark303 wrote: 26 Feb 2024, 13:51 Are we going to have a sweepstake.....
I'm still sticking with Leonardo's sacred Wasteland site will be secured at any cost....
I've added a (somewhat lighthearted) poll! Have fun. :D

P.S: Open to any obscure or mad suggestions people might like to add.
add FARA 😂
Ah, 'Comanche 2: The Next Generation'

Somewhat amused by this article I've just come across.... from the distant past of December 2023.
Why The Future Attack Reconnaissance Aircraft Remains Army Aviation’s Top Modernization Priority
https://www.forbes.com/sites/lorenthomp ... -priority/


Image
"Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room!" - Dr. Strangelove (1964)

User avatar
Jensy
Moderator
Posts: 1091
Joined: 05 Aug 2016, 19:44
United Kingdom

Re: New Medium Helicopter [NMH] - (RAF & AAC)

Post by Jensy »

tomuk wrote: 26 Feb 2024, 15:38 With current polls at 48% Labour, 24% Conservative with predictions of majorities of 280+. Building a couple of dozen helicopters at Broughton will swing the election?

Anyway won't jobs be safe in Broughton if they bring Peter Mandelson's Machine back on line.

Very much of a different era! Never see much of Hugh Dennis anymore.

I'm a former political science postgrad. Expecting the unexpected is about the only fun left in our deeply flawed democracy. :lol:

I'd simply point to the polling Theresa May was enjoying a matter of weeks, and indeed days, before her near trouncing at the hands of Comrade Jezbollah, and his band of cranks, in 2017.
"Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room!" - Dr. Strangelove (1964)

sol
Member
Posts: 563
Joined: 01 Jul 2021, 09:11
Bosnia & Herzegovina

Re: New Medium Helicopter [NMH] - (RAF & AAC)

Post by sol »

So second phase of NMH officially started today. Seems like it ...
... will be bought largely off the shelf, with UK bespoke modifications keep to an absolute minimum.
... and H145 for Cyprus and Brunei will not impact total number of new helicopters required to replace Puma

These users liked the author sol for the post:
Jensy

jonas
Senior Member
Posts: 1110
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 19:20
United Kingdom

Re: New Medium Helicopter [NMH] - (RAF & AAC)

Post by jonas »


SW1
Senior Member
Posts: 5805
Joined: 27 Aug 2018, 19:12
United Kingdom

Re: New Medium Helicopter [NMH] - (RAF & AAC)

Post by SW1 »

sol wrote: 27 Feb 2024, 13:44 So second phase of NMH officially started today. Seems like it ...
... will be bought largely off the shelf, with UK bespoke modifications keep to an absolute minimum.
... and H145 for Cyprus and Brunei will not impact total number of new helicopters required to replace Puma

Remind me how much time and money wasted on producing defence industrial strategy documents?
These users liked the author SW1 for the post (total 3):
serge750Little JSD67


Poiuytrewq
Senior Member
Posts: 4111
Joined: 15 Dec 2017, 10:25
United Kingdom

Re: New Medium Helicopter [NMH] - (RAF & AAC)

Post by Poiuytrewq »

HMG must be heading for a world record in procrastination for the NMH program.

Regardless of the press releases the translation is something along the lines of….”due to inflation and the fact that we want to add pre election tax cutting giveaways to next months budget we have decided to further delay the NMH program to use the allocated funding to plug a little bit more of the black hole in the equipment budget.

P.S.
The NMH program is the next administrations problem now as once again there is no money left.”

It’s amazing Mr Cartlidge managed to keep a straight face.

SW1
Senior Member
Posts: 5805
Joined: 27 Aug 2018, 19:12
United Kingdom

Re: New Medium Helicopter [NMH] - (RAF & AAC)

Post by SW1 »

Poiuytrewq wrote: 27 Feb 2024, 16:22 HMG must be heading for a world record in procrastination for the NMH program.

Regardless of the press releases the translation is something along the lines of….”due to inflation and the fact that we want to add pre election tax cutting giveaways to next months budget we have decided to further delay the NMH program to use the allocated funding to plug a little bit more of the black hole in the equipment budget.

P.S.
The NMH program is the next administrations problem now as once again there is no money left.”

It’s amazing Mr Cartlidge managed to keep a straight face.
Well they did start trying to replace Puma in about 1990….
These users liked the author SW1 for the post:
Jensy

new guy
Senior Member
Posts: 1263
Joined: 18 Apr 2023, 01:53
United Kingdom

Re: New Medium Helicopter [NMH] - (RAF & AAC)

Post by new guy »



You can't make this stuff up....
The way they wrote this it makes it seem like the requirement is for 5 helicopters 🤣

User avatar
Jensy
Moderator
Posts: 1091
Joined: 05 Aug 2016, 19:44
United Kingdom

Re: New Medium Helicopter [NMH] - (RAF & AAC)

Post by Jensy »

SW1 wrote: 27 Feb 2024, 16:41 Well they did start trying to replace Puma in about 1990….
Even earlier! AST.404, the combined Wessex and Puma replacement goes back to the early 80s.

What's amusing is that Black Hawk, one of the original contenders (then to be built by Short Brothers), is still in the running for NMH.
These users liked the author Jensy for the post (total 2):
Clive FSW1
"Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room!" - Dr. Strangelove (1964)

bobp
Senior Member
Posts: 2704
Joined: 06 May 2015, 07:52
United Kingdom

Re: New Medium Helicopter [NMH] - (RAF & AAC)

Post by bobp »

So an invitation to negotiate and not a invitation to tender = kick this down the road for two years minimum.

Little J
Member
Posts: 979
Joined: 02 May 2015, 14:35
United Kingdom

Re: New Medium Helicopter [NMH] - (RAF & AAC)

Post by Little J »

new guy wrote: 27 Feb 2024, 22:15 The way they wrote this it makes it seem like the requirement is for 5 helicopters 🤣
You mean it isn't??? :mrgreen: :angel:
These users liked the author Little J for the post:
Ron5

Ron5
Donator
Posts: 7329
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:42
United States of America

Re: New Medium Helicopter [NMH] - (RAF & AAC)

Post by Ron5 »

If it is true that the services are overwhelmingly in favor of the Black Hawk, and assuming that's based on real objective data (not sentiment), it would be a total disgrace to select one of the other offerings.

And yes, even if it goes against the industrial strategy. All offerings are basically building helicopters from European made kits with a few token British bits thrown in. So actual long term benefits to UK industry are questionable.

PS Thatcher was correct, Westlands should have gone to Sikorsky and Puma should have stayed French.
These users liked the author Ron5 for the post:
Jensy

SD67
Senior Member
Posts: 1082
Joined: 23 Jul 2019, 09:49
United Kingdom

Re: New Medium Helicopter [NMH] - (RAF & AAC)

Post by SD67 »

Actual long term benefit to British Industry is considerable in the case of the Leonardo offering - which has also been selected by Poland and the US, so it's not exactly an orphan like Ajax. Shutting down a major Uk industry just as we're verging on a hot war with Russia? Not terribly smart. We're going to need Westland for Proteus and whatever replaces Merlin. And the USD is going through the roof long term.

IMHO Service preference is not the be all and end all, especially given the Army's track record in destruction of the British AFV industry.
These users liked the author SD67 for the post:
tomuk

SD67
Senior Member
Posts: 1082
Joined: 23 Jul 2019, 09:49
United Kingdom

Re: New Medium Helicopter [NMH] - (RAF & AAC)

Post by SD67 »

Heretical thought here - should we be buying ANY non-marinised helicopters from here on in? Given the pretty clear tilt to an expeditionary CONOPs. Where exactly is an Army-only helicopter going to be used? BAOR doesn't exist anymore.
The USMC don't operate Blackhawk. Or Chinook. Or Apache.

I'd put money on the can being kicked down the road till 2025 when the new SDSR will have its say

Very interesting speech by Shadow SOS at Policy Exchange - lots of emphasis on "Joint by Design"

https://twitter.com/i/broadcasts/1vAGRvLmZVrGl
These users liked the author SD67 for the post:
jedibeeftrix

SW1
Senior Member
Posts: 5805
Joined: 27 Aug 2018, 19:12
United Kingdom

Re: New Medium Helicopter [NMH] - (RAF & AAC)

Post by SW1 »

SD67 wrote: 28 Feb 2024, 17:23 Heretical thought here - should we be buying ANY non-marinised helicopters from here on in? Given the pretty clear tilt to an expeditionary CONOPs. Where exactly is an Army-only helicopter going to be used? BAOR doesn't exist anymore.
The USMC don't operate Blackhawk. Or Chinook. Or Apache.

I'd put money on the can being kicked down the road till 2025 when the new SDSR will have its say

Very interesting speech by Shadow SOS at Policy Exchange - lots of emphasis on "Joint by Design"

https://twitter.com/i/broadcasts/1vAGRvLmZVrGl

Depended what you mean by marinised. Chinooks around the world including in the US have been to sea quite a bit for example.

The problem with the helicopter question when we tried to take a big overview look it quickly got binned because we weren’t wanting to lock in budgets to helicopters to penny packs approach was taken.

But you can never have enough helicopters and vital if you’re really taking about expeditionary (ie no ports, road, airstrips and no contractors to maintain your vehicles in the rear).

You will get into a big bun fight quite quickly over the direction of your force is going because a finite budget can only be taken really properly in one direction.

User avatar
mrclark303
Donator
Posts: 849
Joined: 06 May 2015, 10:47
United Kingdom

Re: New Medium Helicopter [NMH] - (RAF & AAC)

Post by mrclark303 »

SW1 wrote: 28 Feb 2024, 17:53
SD67 wrote: 28 Feb 2024, 17:23 Heretical thought here - should we be buying ANY non-marinised helicopters from here on in? Given the pretty clear tilt to an expeditionary CONOPs. Where exactly is an Army-only helicopter going to be used? BAOR doesn't exist anymore.
The USMC don't operate Blackhawk. Or Chinook. Or Apache.

I'd put money on the can being kicked down the road till 2025 when the new SDSR will have its say

Very interesting speech by Shadow SOS at Policy Exchange - lots of emphasis on "Joint by Design"

https://twitter.com/i/broadcasts/1vAGRvLmZVrGl

Depended what you mean by marinised. Chinooks around the world including in the US have been to sea quite a bit for example.

The problem with the helicopter question when we tried to take a big overview look it quickly got binned because we weren’t wanting to lock in budgets to helicopters to penny packs approach was taken.

But you can never have enough helicopters and vital if you’re really taking about expeditionary (ie no ports, road, airstrips and no contractors to maintain your vehicles in the rear).

You will get into a big bun fight quite quickly over the direction of your force is going because a finite budget can only be taken really properly in one direction.
Whatever we buy, it must be deployable in a maritime environment, we only have 25 HC4's, so we must be able to deploy and operate from Carriers with the new Medium helicopter.

It has to be marinised in respect of having shipboard
compatible avionics and tie down points.

Stability on a pitching deck is another important requirement .
These users liked the author mrclark303 for the post:
Poiuytrewq

SW1
Senior Member
Posts: 5805
Joined: 27 Aug 2018, 19:12
United Kingdom

Re: New Medium Helicopter [NMH] - (RAF & AAC)

Post by SW1 »

mrclark303 wrote: 28 Feb 2024, 20:06
It has to be marinised in respect of having shipboard
compatible avionics and tie down points.

Our Merlin’s didn’t meet that requirement with all our ships……

User avatar
mrclark303
Donator
Posts: 849
Joined: 06 May 2015, 10:47
United Kingdom

Re: New Medium Helicopter [NMH] - (RAF & AAC)

Post by mrclark303 »

SW1 wrote: 28 Feb 2024, 20:32
mrclark303 wrote: 28 Feb 2024, 20:06
It has to be marinised in respect of having shipboard
compatible avionics and tie down points.

Our Merlin’s didn’t meet that requirement with all our ships……
Merlins don't have shipboard compatible avionics or tie down points???

Ron5
Donator
Posts: 7329
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:42
United States of America

Re: New Medium Helicopter [NMH] - (RAF & AAC)

Post by Ron5 »

SD67 wrote: 28 Feb 2024, 17:08 Actual long term benefit to British Industry is considerable in the case of the Leonardo offering - which has also been selected by Poland and the US, so it's not exactly an orphan like Ajax. Shutting down a major Uk industry just as we're verging on a hot war with Russia? Not terribly smart. We're going to need Westland for Proteus and whatever replaces Merlin. And the USD is going through the roof long term.

IMHO Service preference is not the be all and end all, especially given the Army's track record in destruction of the British AFV industry.
I find it difficult to see the long term benefits of building helicopters from kits of parts created elsewhere.

Post Reply