Australian Defence Force

News and discussion threads on defence in other parts of the world.
NickC
Donator
Posts: 1454
Joined: 01 Sep 2017, 14:20
United Kingdom

Re: Australian Defence Force

Post by NickC »

Defense News Redback for Australia write up in Jan '21
"The Redback is also designed with ride comfort in mind, with rubber tracks and independent suspension in lieu of more common metal running gear and torsion bar suspension. Hanwha added that noise reduction measures has also meant it is possible to conduct conversations in the troop compartment, even when the vehicle is moving."

Makes you think of the noisy Ajax.

R686
Senior Member
Posts: 2325
Joined: 28 May 2015, 02:43
Australia

Re: Australian Defence Force

Post by R686 »

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/subscr ... our=append



it is being reported that the MRH-90 Taipan helicopters could be grounded permanently if mechanical failure is found to have caused the crash a few days ago

Mercator
Member
Posts: 681
Joined: 06 May 2015, 02:10
Contact:
Australia

Re: Australian Defence Force

Post by Mercator »

R686 wrote: 31 Jul 2023, 06:29 https://www.theaustralian.com.au/subscr ... our=append



it is being reported that the MRH-90 Taipan helicopters could be grounded permanently if mechanical failure is found to have caused the crash a few days ago
Lotta beat-up old Blackhawks sitting around the US somewhere that could be leased for a year or two. And they only left service here a couple of years ago.

R686
Senior Member
Posts: 2325
Joined: 28 May 2015, 02:43
Australia

Re: Australian Defence Force

Post by R686 »

Mercator wrote: 31 Jul 2023, 07:47
R686 wrote: 31 Jul 2023, 06:29 https://www.theaustralian.com.au/subscr ... our=append



it is being reported that the MRH-90 Taipan helicopters could be grounded permanently if mechanical failure is found to have caused the crash a few days ago
Lotta beat-up old Blackhawks sitting around the US somewhere that could be leased for a year or two. And they only left service here a couple of years ago.
First of the new Blackhawks are set for Q4 this year, so might not be worth the effort.

But is a option I guess.

serge750
Senior Member
Posts: 1093
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:34
United Kingdom

Re: Australian Defence Force

Post by serge750 »

Are you guys getting the seahawk romeo version aswell ? cheers

R686
Senior Member
Posts: 2325
Joined: 28 May 2015, 02:43
Australia

Re: Australian Defence Force

Post by R686 »

serge750 wrote: 31 Jul 2023, 13:24 Are you guys getting the seahawk romeo version aswell ? cheers
We already have 24 with another 12 on order. prior to the Blackhawk buy

We have enough for a ASW carrier would really like to see a Japanese Izumo-class with both MH-60R/F35B with the Hyuga ASW fit out in RAN colours.
These users liked the author R686 for the post:
serge750

RunningStrong
Senior Member
Posts: 1354
Joined: 06 May 2015, 20:52

Re: Australian Defence Force

Post by RunningStrong »

Zeno wrote: 27 Jul 2023, 03:19 There are reports that the German Lynx was supplied for testing with metal tracks and subsequent vibration issues caused several of the testers to become ill , sounds familiar
I think people are forgetting how horrible being in an AFV used to be...

serge750
Senior Member
Posts: 1093
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:34
United Kingdom

Re: Australian Defence Force

Post by serge750 »

R686 wrote: 31 Jul 2023, 15:45
serge750 wrote: 31 Jul 2023, 13:24 Are you guys getting the seahawk romeo version aswell ? cheers
We already have 24 with another 12 on order. prior to the Blackhawk buy

We have enough for a ASW carrier would really like to see a Japanese Izumo-class with both MH-60R/F35B with the Hyuga ASW fit out in RAN colours.
Maybe fitting the canberra class with a F35B heat landing spot could be done as a crossdeck lillypad with the USMC etc F35b or QEC as a part of AUKUS deal as a first step towards operating you own fixed wing aircraft again... Invnicibles started with just 5 sea harriers for a while ....

R686
Senior Member
Posts: 2325
Joined: 28 May 2015, 02:43
Australia

Re: Australian Defence Force

Post by R686 »

serge750 wrote: 31 Jul 2023, 16:35
R686 wrote: 31 Jul 2023, 15:45
serge750 wrote: 31 Jul 2023, 13:24 Are you guys getting the seahawk romeo version aswell ? cheers
We already have 24 with another 12 on order. prior to the Blackhawk buy

We have enough for a ASW carrier would really like to see a Japanese Izumo-class with both MH-60R/F35B with the Hyuga ASW fit out in RAN colours.
Maybe fitting the canberra class with a F35B heat landing spot could be done as a crossdeck lillypad with the USMC etc F35b or QEC as a part of AUKUS deal as a first step towards operating you own fixed wing aircraft again... Invnicibles started with just 5 sea harriers for a while ....
They have already sailed in a task group with a compliment of helicopters I think the longest was a 6 month deployment

My thinking was it a hot environment aUS carrier task group would want a ASW screen that could keep up with the task group and prose a pretty big screen around the task group with the Izumi class have a top speed in excess of 30knots unlike a Canberra class of around 20 knots

Izumho would have the large hull mounted sonar plus it’s own VLS system

Never going to happen but something the RAN needs
These users liked the author R686 for the post (total 3):
serge750wargame_insomniacMercator

Mercator
Member
Posts: 681
Joined: 06 May 2015, 02:10
Contact:
Australia

Re: Australian Defence Force

Post by Mercator »

These users liked the author Mercator for the post (total 3):
Tempest414serge750wargame_insomniac

Mercator
Member
Posts: 681
Joined: 06 May 2015, 02:10
Contact:
Australia

Re: Australian Defence Force

Post by Mercator »

Don't know if this delivery timetable was always planned or whether some deal was engineered, but here they are:


R686
Senior Member
Posts: 2325
Joined: 28 May 2015, 02:43
Australia

Re: Australian Defence Force

Post by R686 »

Mercator wrote: 05 Aug 2023, 10:20 Don't know if this delivery timetable was always planned or whether some deal was engineered, but here they are:

I wonder how fast they are being built?

Expensive way to ship them over would have thought they would have sent them over a LHD and bring them back in one lot

But it is good that they are arriving and the advice sound a saving in the long run otherwise I doubt the ALP would have done it

User avatar
swoop
Member
Posts: 251
Joined: 03 May 2015, 21:25
Pitcairn Island

Re: Australian Defence Force

Post by swoop »

R686 wrote: 05 Aug 2023, 14:38 I wonder how fast they are being built?

Expensive way to ship them over would have thought they would have sent them over a LHD and bring them back in one lot
I'd expect the first few to arrive this way to allow for integration, testing, acceptance trials, etc.
The rest would probably be shipped.

Mercator
Member
Posts: 681
Joined: 06 May 2015, 02:10
Contact:
Australia

Re: Australian Defence Force

Post by Mercator »


"I wouldn't want to raise expectations around having the Black Hawks in service sooner, we are in the process of transitioning to Black Hawks pretty well as of now," the defence minister told reporters last week.

"But it is both a question of having the airframes come to Australia, but also a question of making sure that all the appropriate training and credentialling is done for those who operate the Black Hawks, so that that can be done in a safe way."

Last week's arrival of the initial two Black Hawks has surprised industry figures who believe the delivery appears to be "well ahead of schedule" for a $10 billion purchase which was only finalised this year.
I think the US probably just gave up a few delivery slots for us. Something like that.
These users liked the author Mercator for the post:
R686

R686
Senior Member
Posts: 2325
Joined: 28 May 2015, 02:43
Australia

Re: Australian Defence Force

Post by R686 »

Mercator wrote: 07 Aug 2023, 00:03

"I wouldn't want to raise expectations around having the Black Hawks in service sooner, we are in the process of transitioning to Black Hawks pretty well as of now," the defence minister told reporters last week.

"But it is both a question of having the airframes come to Australia, but also a question of making sure that all the appropriate training and credentialling is done for those who operate the Black Hawks, so that that can be done in a safe way."

Last week's arrival of the initial two Black Hawks has surprised industry figures who believe the delivery appears to be "well ahead of schedule" for a $10 billion purchase which was only finalised this year.
I think the US probably just gave up a few delivery slots for us. Something like that.
Agree,from memory the US put in its last orders in for aprox. 120 odd aircraft late 2022

They also from memory will be supported until the late 2040’s

Mercator
Member
Posts: 681
Joined: 06 May 2015, 02:10
Contact:
Australia

Re: Australian Defence Force

Post by Mercator »

These users liked the author Mercator for the post:
serge750

R686
Senior Member
Posts: 2325
Joined: 28 May 2015, 02:43
Australia

Re: Australian Defence Force

Post by R686 »

Mercator wrote: 10 Aug 2023, 04:46
Only if we lock them in for four ships with a contract that makes it too expensive to pull out of, unlike Anzac class.

SouthernOne
Member
Posts: 122
Joined: 23 Nov 2019, 00:01
Australia

Re: Australian Defence Force

Post by SouthernOne »

R686 wrote: 10 Aug 2023, 13:15
Mercator wrote: 10 Aug 2023, 04:46
Only if we lock them in for four ships with a contract that makes it too expensive to pull out of, unlike Anzac class.
If the RAN wanted to go that way, the Constellation class might be a better fit. The USN will have already completed the integration of AEGIS, ESSM, SM-2, Nulka etc.
These users liked the author SouthernOne for the post:
Mercator

Mercator
Member
Posts: 681
Joined: 06 May 2015, 02:10
Contact:
Australia

Re: Australian Defence Force

Post by Mercator »

yes, but then we are just straight up replacing the T-26. None of this corvette nonsense – just a better frigate. Hobart class, ver 2.0 becomes an option too. Quicker if we let the Spaniards do a couple. Of course, then they'd want to replace AEGIS with CEAFAR on either one of them and we go around again.

Ultimately though, that's how I'd square the circle. Let the OPVs be OPVs. Do the strap on SAM & SSMs if it makes you feel better, but otherwise don't mess with existing plans too much. Leave the T26 at a reasonable number but save money when you can – say six vessels. Improvements in the second batch as you can make them. and just undertake a parallel build of more Hobarts with CEAFAR or the newer AEGIS after a proper assessment of the displacement issues. If need be, do blocks or whole vessels in Spain. We know they can do that and it keeps costs relatively modest while still engaging all available Australian shipbuilding. (I think if we were being honest with ourselves, we could only do parts of a second frigate/corvette line). And the training burden is no higher than what we currently have at sea.

Online
User avatar
Tempest414
Senior Member
Posts: 5630
Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 23:39
France

Re: Australian Defence Force

Post by Tempest414 »

SouthernOne wrote: 13 Aug 2023, 05:49
R686 wrote: 10 Aug 2023, 13:15
Mercator wrote: 10 Aug 2023, 04:46
Only if we lock them in for four ships with a contract that makes it too expensive to pull out of, unlike Anzac class.
If the RAN wanted to go that way, the Constellation class might be a better fit. The USN will have already completed the integration of AEGIS, ESSM, SM-2, Nulka etc.
But given the job of a RAN GP Frigate the extra 3000 nmi range and 4 Knot extra speed of AH-140 must count for something

Online
User avatar
Tempest414
Senior Member
Posts: 5630
Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 23:39
France

Re: Australian Defence Force

Post by Tempest414 »

R686 wrote: 10 Aug 2023, 13:15
Mercator wrote: 10 Aug 2023, 04:46
Only if we lock them in for four ships with a contract that makes it too expensive to pull out of, unlike Anzac class.
What the RAN want and what the RNZN need are someway apart maybe the better option would be that the RNZN went for a Type 31 and then joined the RAN in buying and maintaining weapon stocks

new guy
Senior Member
Posts: 1262
Joined: 18 Apr 2023, 01:53
United Kingdom

Re: Australian Defence Force

Post by new guy »

Tempest414 wrote: 14 Aug 2023, 08:25
SouthernOne wrote: 13 Aug 2023, 05:49
R686 wrote: 10 Aug 2023, 13:15
Mercator wrote: 10 Aug 2023, 04:46
Only if we lock them in for four ships with a contract that makes it too expensive to pull out of, unlike Anzac class.
If the RAN wanted to go that way, the Constellation class might be a better fit. The USN will have already completed the integration of AEGIS, ESSM, SM-2, Nulka etc.
But given the job of a RAN GP Frigate the extra 3000 nmi range and 4 Knot extra speed of AH-140 must count for something
+ half the price, which is what maintains the right to convert from corvettes to this.

inch
Senior Member
Posts: 1314
Joined: 27 May 2015, 21:35

Re: Australian Defence Force

Post by inch »

Be a great delayed victory for Denmark if a few other countries chose their design and why not
These users liked the author inch for the post:
Tempest414

new guy
Senior Member
Posts: 1262
Joined: 18 Apr 2023, 01:53
United Kingdom

Re: Australian Defence Force

Post by new guy »

inch wrote: 14 Aug 2023, 13:31 Be a great delayed victory for Denmark if a few other countries chose their design and why not
?

SouthernOne
Member
Posts: 122
Joined: 23 Nov 2019, 00:01
Australia

Re: Australian Defence Force

Post by SouthernOne »

Tempest414 wrote: 14 Aug 2023, 08:56
R686 wrote: 10 Aug 2023, 13:15
Mercator wrote: 10 Aug 2023, 04:46
Only if we lock them in for four ships with a contract that makes it too expensive to pull out of, unlike Anzac class.
What the RAN want and what the RNZN need are someway apart maybe the better option would be that the RNZN went for a Type 31 and then joined the RAN in buying and maintaining weapon stocks
You only need to look at the respective NZ and Aus upgrades to their ANZAC class frigates to see how divergent their expectations are.

Post Reply