What should a balanced UK armed forces look like?
- ArmChairCivvy
- Senior Member
- Posts: 16312
- Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
Re: What should a balanced UK armed forces look like?
Okay, further into the definitions jungle:
Even if there is/ were a Corps HQ, it does not mean that we would (or could) deploy a Corps.
AARC went through a productive transformation when it was deployed to Command a multinational division in S.Afghanistan (not that the other parts under it ever got a mention in the UK press).
- since then there have been cuts to e.g. the signals elements, so how ready it is to deploy... who knows. We will play a leading part in the N. Europe response force, though. Albeit small as a standing force, has potential to quickly grow into a real Corps
We did stand up a Corps HQ (briefly) for the Suez Op, not sure if it was more for a political balance between the participating forces rather than because of their overall number?
Even if there is/ were a Corps HQ, it does not mean that we would (or could) deploy a Corps.
AARC went through a productive transformation when it was deployed to Command a multinational division in S.Afghanistan (not that the other parts under it ever got a mention in the UK press).
- since then there have been cuts to e.g. the signals elements, so how ready it is to deploy... who knows. We will play a leading part in the N. Europe response force, though. Albeit small as a standing force, has potential to quickly grow into a real Corps
We did stand up a Corps HQ (briefly) for the Suez Op, not sure if it was more for a political balance between the participating forces rather than because of their overall number?
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4640
- Joined: 01 May 2015, 10:22
Re: What should a balanced UK armed forces look like?
that was described as Div Minus in my dayarfah wrote:Wahay! Someone's quoted Wikipedia.
I did not refer to the "Light Division" but a "light division" as in not as large as the usual strength of a division.
a light division is a light role division ie not armoured or mechanised but made up of light role troops.
-
- Member
- Posts: 24
- Joined: 31 Jan 2016, 14:49
Re: What should a balanced UK armed forces look like?
If you check the US ´eye´ corps, you will find that they don´t even have two divisions, more like one and two thirds - unless Wikipedia has got that wrong too. I find it easier to believe that you have got it wrong, perhaps because most of the other formations come in threes, at least in the British Army anyway.arfah wrote:Wahay! Someone's quoted Wikipedia.
I did not refer to the "Light Division" but a "light division" as in not as large as the usual strength of a division.
- ArmChairCivvy
- Senior Member
- Posts: 16312
- Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
Re: What should a balanced UK armed forces look like?
3 (the minimum for any manoeuvre with some type of uncommitted reserve) vs. a "square" formation (with 4) is an age old debate... so old that the square (I believe) relates to an ability to form a phalanx against attacks from all sides, and can then quickly transform to a "command-able" linear advance. Roman times and all that...necessary evil wrote:because most of the other formations come in threes, at least in the British Army anyway.
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
Re: What should a balanced UK armed forces look like?
-<>-<>-<>-
Admin Note: This user is banned after turning most of their old posts into spam. This is why you may see their posts containing nothing more than dots or symbols. We have decided to keep these posts in place as it shows where they once were and why other users may be replying to things no longer visible in the topic. We apologise for any inconvenience.
-
- Member
- Posts: 780
- Joined: 03 May 2015, 16:19
Re: What should a balanced UK armed forces look like?
Arfah is quite right. A Corps in the British Army has never really been a particularly well defined unit of measure. From my own experience it is pretty much a term that could theoretically be applied to any formation larger consisting of at least two Divisions - the 'rule of three' not being definitive.
Take the BEF in 1914 for example. We fielded two Corps each comprised of two Divisions. Admittedly they were both understrength as they had an officially mandated strength of three Divisions apiece but the term is very flexible. Hell, we hadn't operated in actual Corps sized formations in field exercises until just prior to the outbreak of the Great War, IIRC - we rarely exercised at Divisional strength either. Long story short, as with most matters of ORBAT in the British Army outside the comparatively well defined Regimental system, it was ad-hoc.
Take the BEF in 1914 for example. We fielded two Corps each comprised of two Divisions. Admittedly they were both understrength as they had an officially mandated strength of three Divisions apiece but the term is very flexible. Hell, we hadn't operated in actual Corps sized formations in field exercises until just prior to the outbreak of the Great War, IIRC - we rarely exercised at Divisional strength either. Long story short, as with most matters of ORBAT in the British Army outside the comparatively well defined Regimental system, it was ad-hoc.
Re: What should a balanced UK armed forces look like?
-<>-<>-<>-
Admin Note: This user is banned after turning most of their old posts into spam. This is why you may see their posts containing nothing more than dots or symbols. We have decided to keep these posts in place as it shows where they once were and why other users may be replying to things no longer visible in the topic. We apologise for any inconvenience.
-
- Member
- Posts: 24
- Joined: 31 Jan 2016, 14:49
Re: What should a balanced UK armed forces look like?
Your own examples prove you wrong, since you said that a corps is three divisions. The British Army could support it in a WW3-type scenario, but it would take a while to get it together.arfah wrote:WW2: XXX CORPS was 2 Divisions + a BDE.
Which is over and above 2 Divisions. No?
A CORPS is a formation that the British Army cannot support at current strength.
-
- Member
- Posts: 24
- Joined: 31 Jan 2016, 14:49
Re: What should a balanced UK armed forces look like?
Erm, if you read the thread again I think you will find that I was quite right, and that Arfah was wrong.~UNiOnJaCk~ wrote:Arfah is quite right. A Corps in the British Army has never really been a particularly well defined unit of measure. From my own experience it is pretty much a term that could theoretically be applied to any formation larger consisting of at least two Divisions - the 'rule of three' not being definitive.
Take the BEF in 1914 for example. We fielded two Corps each comprised of two Divisions. Admittedly they were both understrength as they had an officially mandated strength of three Divisions apiece but the term is very flexible. Hell, we hadn't operated in actual Corps sized formations in field exercises until just prior to the outbreak of the Great War, IIRC - we rarely exercised at Divisional strength either. Long story short, as with most matters of ORBAT in the British Army outside the comparatively well defined Regimental system, it was ad-hoc.
Re: What should a balanced UK armed forces look like?
-<>-<>-<>-
Admin Note: This user is banned after turning most of their old posts into spam. This is why you may see their posts containing nothing more than dots or symbols. We have decided to keep these posts in place as it shows where they once were and why other users may be replying to things no longer visible in the topic. We apologise for any inconvenience.
-
- Member
- Posts: 780
- Joined: 03 May 2015, 16:19
Re: What should a balanced UK armed forces look like?
Well whatever the case, a Corps in the British Army has traditionally been whatever the Army wants it to be at the time - two Divisions, three Divisions etc. It's not something we have ever traditionally attempted to rely on as formations go, now more than ever.necessary evil wrote:
Erm, if you read the thread again I think you will find that I was quite right, and that Arfah was wrong.
Re: What should a balanced UK armed forces look like?
-<>-<>-<>-
Admin Note: This user is banned after turning most of their old posts into spam. This is why you may see their posts containing nothing more than dots or symbols. We have decided to keep these posts in place as it shows where they once were and why other users may be replying to things no longer visible in the topic. We apologise for any inconvenience.
-
- Member
- Posts: 24
- Joined: 31 Jan 2016, 14:49
Re: What should a balanced UK armed forces look like?
Yep, I agree.~UNiOnJaCk~ wrote:Well whatever the case, a Corps in the British Army has traditionally been whatever the Army wants it to be at the time - two Divisions, three Divisions etc. It's not something we have ever traditionally attempted to rely on as formations go, now more than ever.necessary evil wrote:
Erm, if you read the thread again I think you will find that I was quite right, and that Arfah was wrong.
-
- Member
- Posts: 24
- Joined: 31 Jan 2016, 14:49
Re: What should a balanced UK armed forces look like?
Couple of tips for you.arfah wrote:Really? The Corps was under strength because,necessary evil wrote:Your own examples prove you wrong, since you said that a corps is 3 divisions. The British Army could support it in a WW3-type scenario, but it would take a while to get it together.arfah wrote:WW2: XXX CORPS was 2 Divisions + a BDE.
Which is over and above 2 Divisions. No?
A CORPS is a formation that the British Army cannot support at current strength.
"There was a war on"
You yourself admitted that the British Army works to the rule of three.
You then reasoned with a mention of a US formation.
The British Army is not the U.S. Army and does things differently.
You also quoted 'Wiki' - I could edit that very page to suit whatever argument I wanted to make.
I've since added that 1(BR) Corps had 4 Divisions. Which is over and above the 3 Divisions that I mentioned, earlier.
I can only conclude that the mean average stands at 3 Divisions.
Edit: WW3? Do you really think there will be 'time' available? 4 minutes to establish a Corps, ready, steady, go!
I think I debated my point enough.
Take it to pm's.
1. If you are going to try to be a pedant, make sure you have your facts right first.
2. Consider taking a course in basic logic.
Re: What should a balanced UK armed forces look like?
-<>-<>-<>-
Admin Note: This user is banned after turning most of their old posts into spam. This is why you may see their posts containing nothing more than dots or symbols. We have decided to keep these posts in place as it shows where they once were and why other users may be replying to things no longer visible in the topic. We apologise for any inconvenience.
Re: What should a balanced UK armed forces look like?
Cool, an internet dick measuring contest....that's rare
Re: What should a balanced UK armed forces look like?
I've not had so much fun since mp.net
Admin Note: This user is banned after turning most of their old posts into spam. This is why you may see their posts containing nothing more than dots or symbols. We have decided to keep these posts in place as it shows where they once were and why other users may be replying to things no longer visible in the topic. We apologise for any inconvenience.
-
- Member
- Posts: 24
- Joined: 31 Jan 2016, 14:49
Re: What should a balanced UK armed forces look like?
I think you have confused continuing to argue the point when you have obviously lost (find one definiton of a corps as three divisions, go on!) with understanding basic logic. They are quite different, believe me.
And before you accuse me of being a hypocrite again, here are the definitions that support what I claimed (that 6 brigades could potentially make up two divisions and therefore one corps):
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/corps
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/defin ... lish/corps
One American and one British.
I haven´t found any that say it is three divisions yet, funny that. I´m sure you can help us out with that. I mean, you wouldn´t just have made up something like that, would you?
And before you accuse me of being a hypocrite again, here are the definitions that support what I claimed (that 6 brigades could potentially make up two divisions and therefore one corps):
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/corps
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/defin ... lish/corps
One American and one British.
I haven´t found any that say it is three divisions yet, funny that. I´m sure you can help us out with that. I mean, you wouldn´t just have made up something like that, would you?
Re: What should a balanced UK armed forces look like?
-<>-<>-<>-
Admin Note: This user is banned after turning most of their old posts into spam. This is why you may see their posts containing nothing more than dots or symbols. We have decided to keep these posts in place as it shows where they once were and why other users may be replying to things no longer visible in the topic. We apologise for any inconvenience.
-
- Member
- Posts: 24
- Joined: 31 Jan 2016, 14:49
Re: What should a balanced UK armed forces look like?
Yes, it can be two, just as UnionJack and I have been saying for the last couple of pages.
Re: What should a balanced UK armed forces look like?
-<>-<>-<>-
Admin Note: This user is banned after turning most of their old posts into spam. This is why you may see their posts containing nothing more than dots or symbols. We have decided to keep these posts in place as it shows where they once were and why other users may be replying to things no longer visible in the topic. We apologise for any inconvenience.
-
- Retired Site Admin
- Posts: 2657
- Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:10
Re: What should a balanced UK armed forces look like?
All right, lads. Chill. No more posts on this after mine, take it to PM.