The Blackhawk is about to be replaced with an aircraft with composite's... Or maybe we should be getting the Wessex back in service?mrclark303 wrote: ↑18 Jan 2023, 09:21The issue of composite construction came sharply into focus in Afghanistan, when shot up Blackhawks and Chinooks were patched up and rapidly sent back into the fight. Merlin on the other hand was grounded requiring specialist repairs.SD67 wrote: ↑02 Oct 2022, 11:39 That sounds super conservative to my inexpert ears. How many combat platforms are not going to be made out of composites in say 20 years time? Honest question. I read somewhere AH64E is going to be getting a composite tail boom. How many times have bits been shot off a Puma and it actually has been patched up in the field? Is this an Afghan-specific thing or a genuine all round requirement?
Here's something I found re composite repair
file:///C:/Users/simon/Downloads/MP-AVT-266-05.pdf
With regards to Puma replacement, then we need a robust, tested and proven platform, i.e the Blackhawk.
Puma Helicopter (RAF)
Re: Puma Helicopter (RAF)
- These users liked the author Little J for the post:
- mrclark303
Re: Puma Helicopter (RAF)
Well I would never underestimate the RAF's devotion to the prosperity of the US aviation industry so I'm guessing some Polish built Blackhawks with a "test and certification facility" in Wales creating oooh at least 100 jobs
- mrclark303
- Donator
- Posts: 853
- Joined: 06 May 2015, 10:47
Re: Puma Helicopter (RAF)
The Blackhawk will be replaced, well, yes and no.Little J wrote: ↑18 Jan 2023, 13:39The Blackhawk is about to be replaced with an aircraft with composite's... Or maybe we should be getting the Wessex back in service?mrclark303 wrote: ↑18 Jan 2023, 09:21The issue of composite construction came sharply into focus in Afghanistan, when shot up Blackhawks and Chinooks were patched up and rapidly sent back into the fight. Merlin on the other hand was grounded requiring specialist repairs.SD67 wrote: ↑02 Oct 2022, 11:39 That sounds super conservative to my inexpert ears. How many combat platforms are not going to be made out of composites in say 20 years time? Honest question. I read somewhere AH64E is going to be getting a composite tail boom. How many times have bits been shot off a Puma and it actually has been patched up in the field? Is this an Afghan-specific thing or a genuine all round requirement?
Here's something I found re composite repair
file:///C:/Users/simon/Downloads/MP-AVT-266-05.pdf
With regards to Puma replacement, then we need a robust, tested and proven platform, i.e the Blackhawk.
The replacement is 'years' away, probably 2030 before the first is fielded and the M version of the Blackhawk, will be in service for at least 20 more years before it's finally stood down.
- mrclark303
- Donator
- Posts: 853
- Joined: 06 May 2015, 10:47
Re: Puma Helicopter (RAF)
All the ground fire that Merlin took required specialist inspection and repair, Chinook and Blackhawk could have skin patches applied and back into the fight, as long as no systems were damaged.SW1 wrote: ↑18 Jan 2023, 12:24Where was the damage on Merlin that kept it grounded?mrclark303 wrote: ↑18 Jan 2023, 09:21The issue of composite construction came sharply into focus in Afghanistan, when shot up Blackhawks and Chinooks were patched up and rapidly sent back into the fight. Merlin on the other hand was grounded requiring specialist repairs.SD67 wrote: ↑02 Oct 2022, 11:39 That sounds super conservative to my inexpert ears. How many combat platforms are not going to be made out of composites in say 20 years time? Honest question. I read somewhere AH64E is going to be getting a composite tail boom. How many times have bits been shot off a Puma and it actually has been patched up in the field? Is this an Afghan-specific thing or a genuine all round requirement?
Here's something I found re composite repair
file:///C:/Users/simon/Downloads/MP-AVT-266-05.pdf
With regards to Puma replacement, then we need a robust, tested and proven platform, i.e the Blackhawk.
Medivac Blackhawks were literally patched and back in the fight inside hours of getting shot up on occasion!
Something impossible on a modern, overly complex composite helicopter.
Manufacturers seem to forget that their products might just have to land right in the middle of a firefight, in a really hot LZ and do it over and over again.....
Blackhawk, keep it simple stupid!
Re: Puma Helicopter (RAF)
So we’ve gone from grounded to needing an inspection. I guarantee you the other helicopters would have had an inspection and repair applied too.mrclark303 wrote: ↑18 Jan 2023, 19:35All the ground fire that Merlin took required specialist inspection and repair, Chinook and Blackhawk could have skin patches applied and back into the fight, as long as no systems were damaged.SW1 wrote: ↑18 Jan 2023, 12:24Where was the damage on Merlin that kept it grounded?mrclark303 wrote: ↑18 Jan 2023, 09:21The issue of composite construction came sharply into focus in Afghanistan, when shot up Blackhawks and Chinooks were patched up and rapidly sent back into the fight. Merlin on the other hand was grounded requiring specialist repairs.SD67 wrote: ↑02 Oct 2022, 11:39 That sounds super conservative to my inexpert ears. How many combat platforms are not going to be made out of composites in say 20 years time? Honest question. I read somewhere AH64E is going to be getting a composite tail boom. How many times have bits been shot off a Puma and it actually has been patched up in the field? Is this an Afghan-specific thing or a genuine all round requirement?
Here's something I found re composite repair
file:///C:/Users/simon/Downloads/MP-AVT-266-05.pdf
With regards to Puma replacement, then we need a robust, tested and proven platform, i.e the Blackhawk.
Medivac Blackhawks were literally patched and back in the fight inside hours of getting shot up on occasion!
Something impossible on a modern, overly complex composite helicopter.
Manufacturers seem to forget that their products might just have to land right in the middle of a firefight, in a really hot LZ and do it over and over again.....
Blackhawk, keep it simple stupid!
Composite structure is not “overly complex” and can be patched with metallics if required.
Merlin is a complex helicopter but that is not the result of composites.
Manufactures or the engineers that design them are well aware of where there helicopters will be used.
- mrclark303
- Donator
- Posts: 853
- Joined: 06 May 2015, 10:47
Re: Puma Helicopter (RAF)
It's a simple fact that Merlin was found to require considerable additional repair and downtime in comparison to Blackhawk and Chinook...SW1 wrote: ↑18 Jan 2023, 22:09So we’ve gone from grounded to needing an inspection. I guarantee you the other helicopters would have had an inspection and repair applied too.mrclark303 wrote: ↑18 Jan 2023, 19:35All the ground fire that Merlin took required specialist inspection and repair, Chinook and Blackhawk could have skin patches applied and back into the fight, as long as no systems were damaged.SW1 wrote: ↑18 Jan 2023, 12:24Where was the damage on Merlin that kept it grounded?mrclark303 wrote: ↑18 Jan 2023, 09:21The issue of composite construction came sharply into focus in Afghanistan, when shot up Blackhawks and Chinooks were patched up and rapidly sent back into the fight. Merlin on the other hand was grounded requiring specialist repairs.SD67 wrote: ↑02 Oct 2022, 11:39 That sounds super conservative to my inexpert ears. How many combat platforms are not going to be made out of composites in say 20 years time? Honest question. I read somewhere AH64E is going to be getting a composite tail boom. How many times have bits been shot off a Puma and it actually has been patched up in the field? Is this an Afghan-specific thing or a genuine all round requirement?
Here's something I found re composite repair
file:///C:/Users/simon/Downloads/MP-AVT-266-05.pdf
With regards to Puma replacement, then we need a robust, tested and proven platform, i.e the Blackhawk.
Medivac Blackhawks were literally patched and back in the fight inside hours of getting shot up on occasion!
Something impossible on a modern, overly complex composite helicopter.
Manufacturers seem to forget that their products might just have to land right in the middle of a firefight, in a really hot LZ and do it over and over again.....
Blackhawk, keep it simple stupid!
Composite structure is not “overly complex” and can be patched with metallics if required.
Merlin is a complex helicopter but that is not the result of composites.
Manufactures or the engineers that design them are well aware of where there helicopters will be used.
You can guarantee the Lenardo and Airbus offerings will bring three things to the table.
A: far more fragile and needlessly complex than Blackhawk.
B: Double the unit price, at the very least.
C: Be at least 5 years late after UK specific 'modifications'.
The basics, the RAF and Army need a medium support helicopter, UH60M is available right now, utterly reliable, combat proven, affordable and able to do exactly what's needed.
We could order 50 and start receiving UH60's within two years, we could also order the Spec Ops version too to back up our Spec Ops Chinook fleet.
Alas, keeping an Italian owned factory, assembling Italian Helicopters open is more important politically, so the smart money goes on the 'wastelands' factory product.
The unit cost will end up being so high the Mod will be lucky to order 25.
Anyone care to place a wager?
Re: Puma Helicopter (RAF)
Yes, $1,000 says you are full of shit on your claims except the one where you maintain costs will rise and fewer will be bought. That's a given with inflation and a decreasing defence budget.mrclark303 wrote: ↑18 Jan 2023, 23:56It's a simple fact that Merlin was found to require considerable additional repair and downtime in comparison to Blackhawk and Chinook...SW1 wrote: ↑18 Jan 2023, 22:09So we’ve gone from grounded to needing an inspection. I guarantee you the other helicopters would have had an inspection and repair applied too.mrclark303 wrote: ↑18 Jan 2023, 19:35All the ground fire that Merlin took required specialist inspection and repair, Chinook and Blackhawk could have skin patches applied and back into the fight, as long as no systems were damaged.SW1 wrote: ↑18 Jan 2023, 12:24Where was the damage on Merlin that kept it grounded?mrclark303 wrote: ↑18 Jan 2023, 09:21The issue of composite construction came sharply into focus in Afghanistan, when shot up Blackhawks and Chinooks were patched up and rapidly sent back into the fight. Merlin on the other hand was grounded requiring specialist repairs.SD67 wrote: ↑02 Oct 2022, 11:39 That sounds super conservative to my inexpert ears. How many combat platforms are not going to be made out of composites in say 20 years time? Honest question. I read somewhere AH64E is going to be getting a composite tail boom. How many times have bits been shot off a Puma and it actually has been patched up in the field? Is this an Afghan-specific thing or a genuine all round requirement?
Here's something I found re composite repair
file:///C:/Users/simon/Downloads/MP-AVT-266-05.pdf
With regards to Puma replacement, then we need a robust, tested and proven platform, i.e the Blackhawk.
Medivac Blackhawks were literally patched and back in the fight inside hours of getting shot up on occasion!
Something impossible on a modern, overly complex composite helicopter.
Manufacturers seem to forget that their products might just have to land right in the middle of a firefight, in a really hot LZ and do it over and over again.....
Blackhawk, keep it simple stupid!
Composite structure is not “overly complex” and can be patched with metallics if required.
Merlin is a complex helicopter but that is not the result of composites.
Manufactures or the engineers that design them are well aware of where there helicopters will be used.
You can guarantee the Lenardo and Airbus offerings will bring three things to the table.
A: far more fragile and needlessly complex than Blackhawk.
B: Double the unit price, at the very least.
C: Be at least 5 years late after UK specific 'modifications'.
The basics, the RAF and Army need a medium support helicopter, UH60M is available right now, utterly reliable, combat proven, affordable and able to do exactly what's needed.
We could order 50 and start receiving UH60's within two years, we could also order the Spec Ops version too to back up our Spec Ops Chinook fleet.
Alas, keeping an Italian owned factory, assembling Italian Helicopters open is more important politically, so the smart money goes on the 'wastelands' factory product.
The unit cost will end up being so high the Mod will be lucky to order 25.
Anyone care to place a wager?
Re: Puma Helicopter (RAF)
Well the fact is the US army just ordered a composite helicopter - the V-280.mrclark303 wrote: ↑18 Jan 2023, 19:35All the ground fire that Merlin took required specialist inspection and repair, Chinook and Blackhawk could have skin patches applied and back into the fight, as long as no systems were damaged.SW1 wrote: ↑18 Jan 2023, 12:24Where was the damage on Merlin that kept it grounded?mrclark303 wrote: ↑18 Jan 2023, 09:21The issue of composite construction came sharply into focus in Afghanistan, when shot up Blackhawks and Chinooks were patched up and rapidly sent back into the fight. Merlin on the other hand was grounded requiring specialist repairs.SD67 wrote: ↑02 Oct 2022, 11:39 That sounds super conservative to my inexpert ears. How many combat platforms are not going to be made out of composites in say 20 years time? Honest question. I read somewhere AH64E is going to be getting a composite tail boom. How many times have bits been shot off a Puma and it actually has been patched up in the field? Is this an Afghan-specific thing or a genuine all round requirement?
Here's something I found re composite repair
file:///C:/Users/simon/Downloads/MP-AVT-266-05.pdf
With regards to Puma replacement, then we need a robust, tested and proven platform, i.e the Blackhawk.
Medivac Blackhawks were literally patched and back in the fight inside hours of getting shot up on occasion!
Something impossible on a modern, overly complex composite helicopter.
Manufacturers seem to forget that their products might just have to land right in the middle of a firefight, in a really hot LZ and do it over and over again.....
Blackhawk, keep it simple stupid!
And as for affordability - have you checked the USD/GBP exchange rate recently?
- mrclark303
- Donator
- Posts: 853
- Joined: 06 May 2015, 10:47
Re: Puma Helicopter (RAF)
Oh no its the Grinch .Ron5 wrote: ↑19 Jan 2023, 14:18Yes, $1,000 says you are full of shit on your claims except the one where you maintain costs will rise and fewer will be bought. That's a given with inflation and a decreasing defence budget.mrclark303 wrote: ↑18 Jan 2023, 23:56It's a simple fact that Merlin was found to require considerable additional repair and downtime in comparison to Blackhawk and Chinook...SW1 wrote: ↑18 Jan 2023, 22:09So we’ve gone from grounded to needing an inspection. I guarantee you the other helicopters would have had an inspection and repair applied too.mrclark303 wrote: ↑18 Jan 2023, 19:35All the ground fire that Merlin took required specialist inspection and repair, Chinook and Blackhawk could have skin patches applied and back into the fight, as long as no systems were damaged.SW1 wrote: ↑18 Jan 2023, 12:24Where was the damage on Merlin that kept it grounded?mrclark303 wrote: ↑18 Jan 2023, 09:21The issue of composite construction came sharply into focus in Afghanistan, when shot up Blackhawks and Chinooks were patched up and rapidly sent back into the fight. Merlin on the other hand was grounded requiring specialist repairs.SD67 wrote: ↑02 Oct 2022, 11:39 That sounds super conservative to my inexpert ears. How many combat platforms are not going to be made out of composites in say 20 years time? Honest question. I read somewhere AH64E is going to be getting a composite tail boom. How many times have bits been shot off a Puma and it actually has been patched up in the field? Is this an Afghan-specific thing or a genuine all round requirement?
Here's something I found re composite repair
file:///C:/Users/simon/Downloads/MP-AVT-266-05.pdf
With regards to Puma replacement, then we need a robust, tested and proven platform, i.e the Blackhawk.
Medivac Blackhawks were literally patched and back in the fight inside hours of getting shot up on occasion!
Something impossible on a modern, overly complex composite helicopter.
Manufacturers seem to forget that their products might just have to land right in the middle of a firefight, in a really hot LZ and do it over and over again.....
Blackhawk, keep it simple stupid!
Composite structure is not “overly complex” and can be patched with metallics if required.
Merlin is a complex helicopter but that is not the result of composites.
Manufactures or the engineers that design them are well aware of where there helicopters will be used.
You can guarantee the Lenardo and Airbus offerings will bring three things to the table.
A: far more fragile and needlessly complex than Blackhawk.
B: Double the unit price, at the very least.
C: Be at least 5 years late after UK specific 'modifications'.
The basics, the RAF and Army need a medium support helicopter, UH60M is available right now, utterly reliable, combat proven, affordable and able to do exactly what's needed.
We could order 50 and start receiving UH60's within two years, we could also order the Spec Ops version too to back up our Spec Ops Chinook fleet.
Alas, keeping an Italian owned factory, assembling Italian Helicopters open is more important politically, so the smart money goes on the 'wastelands' factory product.
The unit cost will end up being so high the Mod will be lucky to order 25.
Anyone care to place a wager?
I see you haven't changed your name on here yet for repeatedly making a fool of yourself, like your stirling efforts on the UK Defence journal and Navy Lookout Ron, aka the Grinch.
Admin, help Ron change his name please...
.
- mrclark303
- Donator
- Posts: 853
- Joined: 06 May 2015, 10:47
Re: Puma Helicopter (RAF)
Afternoon SD67, they certainly have, but V280 is still years away from frontline service. Let's not forget the US Government V "losers weepers" law suit that's about to kick off, probably adding at least a few more years to the wait.SD67 wrote: ↑19 Jan 2023, 16:49Well the fact is the US army just ordered a composite helicopter - the V-280.mrclark303 wrote: ↑18 Jan 2023, 19:35All the ground fire that Merlin took required specialist inspection and repair, Chinook and Blackhawk could have skin patches applied and back into the fight, as long as no systems were damaged.SW1 wrote: ↑18 Jan 2023, 12:24Where was the damage on Merlin that kept it grounded?mrclark303 wrote: ↑18 Jan 2023, 09:21The issue of composite construction came sharply into focus in Afghanistan, when shot up Blackhawks and Chinooks were patched up and rapidly sent back into the fight. Merlin on the other hand was grounded requiring specialist repairs.SD67 wrote: ↑02 Oct 2022, 11:39 That sounds super conservative to my inexpert ears. How many combat platforms are not going to be made out of composites in say 20 years time? Honest question. I read somewhere AH64E is going to be getting a composite tail boom. How many times have bits been shot off a Puma and it actually has been patched up in the field? Is this an Afghan-specific thing or a genuine all round requirement?
Here's something I found re composite repair
file:///C:/Users/simon/Downloads/MP-AVT-266-05.pdf
With regards to Puma replacement, then we need a robust, tested and proven platform, i.e the Blackhawk.
Medivac Blackhawks were literally patched and back in the fight inside hours of getting shot up on occasion!
Something impossible on a modern, overly complex composite helicopter.
Manufacturers seem to forget that their products might just have to land right in the middle of a firefight, in a really hot LZ and do it over and over again.....
Blackhawk, keep it simple stupid!
And as for affordability - have you checked the USD/GBP exchange rate recently?
I fully expect the UK to eventually go the same route, but it's decades away. Re any metric you care to offer, I would guarantee you can buy at least two US Army standard UH60M's (with support) for the price of a single Wasteland build Lenardo offering...
We all know that once UK specific modifications are factored in, the delivery date will slip to the right and the price will go through the roof. It's time honoured MOD procurement tradition!
- mrclark303
- Donator
- Posts: 853
- Joined: 06 May 2015, 10:47
Re: Puma Helicopter (RAF)
I'll have that $1000 bet with you Mr Grinch, just decide which name you're using and I'll draw up a contract...mrclark303 wrote: ↑19 Jan 2023, 18:05Oh no its the Grinch .Ron5 wrote: ↑19 Jan 2023, 14:18Yes, $1,000 says you are full of shit on your claims except the one where you maintain costs will rise and fewer will be bought. That's a given with inflation and a decreasing defence budget.mrclark303 wrote: ↑18 Jan 2023, 23:56It's a simple fact that Merlin was found to require considerable additional repair and downtime in comparison to Blackhawk and Chinook...SW1 wrote: ↑18 Jan 2023, 22:09So we’ve gone from grounded to needing an inspection. I guarantee you the other helicopters would have had an inspection and repair applied too.mrclark303 wrote: ↑18 Jan 2023, 19:35All the ground fire that Merlin took required specialist inspection and repair, Chinook and Blackhawk could have skin patches applied and back into the fight, as long as no systems were damaged.SW1 wrote: ↑18 Jan 2023, 12:24Where was the damage on Merlin that kept it grounded?mrclark303 wrote: ↑18 Jan 2023, 09:21The issue of composite construction came sharply into focus in Afghanistan, when shot up Blackhawks and Chinooks were patched up and rapidly sent back into the fight. Merlin on the other hand was grounded requiring specialist repairs.SD67 wrote: ↑02 Oct 2022, 11:39 That sounds super conservative to my inexpert ears. How many combat platforms are not going to be made out of composites in say 20 years time? Honest question. I read somewhere AH64E is going to be getting a composite tail boom. How many times have bits been shot off a Puma and it actually has been patched up in the field? Is this an Afghan-specific thing or a genuine all round requirement?
Here's something I found re composite repair
file:///C:/Users/simon/Downloads/MP-AVT-266-05.pdf
With regards to Puma replacement, then we need a robust, tested and proven platform, i.e the Blackhawk.
Medivac Blackhawks were literally patched and back in the fight inside hours of getting shot up on occasion!
Something impossible on a modern, overly complex composite helicopter.
Manufacturers seem to forget that their products might just have to land right in the middle of a firefight, in a really hot LZ and do it over and over again.....
Blackhawk, keep it simple stupid!
Composite structure is not “overly complex” and can be patched with metallics if required.
Merlin is a complex helicopter but that is not the result of composites.
Manufactures or the engineers that design them are well aware of where there helicopters will be used.
You can guarantee the Lenardo and Airbus offerings will bring three things to the table.
A: far more fragile and needlessly complex than Blackhawk.
B: Double the unit price, at the very least.
C: Be at least 5 years late after UK specific 'modifications'.
The basics, the RAF and Army need a medium support helicopter, UH60M is available right now, utterly reliable, combat proven, affordable and able to do exactly what's needed.
We could order 50 and start receiving UH60's within two years, we could also order the Spec Ops version too to back up our Spec Ops Chinook fleet.
Alas, keeping an Italian owned factory, assembling Italian Helicopters open is more important politically, so the smart money goes on the 'wastelands' factory product.
The unit cost will end up being so high the Mod will be lucky to order 25.
Anyone care to place a wager?
I see you haven't changed your name on here yet for repeatedly making a fool of yourself, like your stirling efforts on the UK Defence journal and Navy Lookout Ron, aka the Grinch.
Admin, help Ron change his name please...
.
Re: Puma Helicopter (RAF)
Aaaaw c'mon. Ron keeps me going in boring Teams meetings.
I used to have this theory the he's actually Don Rumsfeld - Ron / Don geddit? but I guess 2021 blew that out of the water...
I used to have this theory the he's actually Don Rumsfeld - Ron / Don geddit? but I guess 2021 blew that out of the water...
- These users liked the author SD67 for the post:
- mrclark303
- mrclark303
- Donator
- Posts: 853
- Joined: 06 May 2015, 10:47
Re: Puma Helicopter (RAF)
I wouldn't have a problem with it SD67, but trolling has unfortunately ruined many good forums over the years...
Re: Puma Helicopter (RAF)
Almost amusing when you think the NMH bidding process has been recently delayed by the MoD.
Starting to get a whiff of death about the whole thing.
I wonder what it would take to keep Puma running till 2035.
"Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room!" - Dr. Strangelove (1964)
Re: Puma Helicopter (RAF)
Wow. 100million a year. Lets say it's half labour half materials. So that means 50 million Lab + OH. If the charge out rate is 100 GBP / hour then they're spending 500,000 hours per year, or 62,500 mandays. So they must have 312 people working fulltime on Puma without a break. Quite some facility
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4101
- Joined: 15 Dec 2017, 10:25
Re: Puma Helicopter (RAF)
It would be interesting to see the costs broken down.SD67 wrote: ↑07 Sep 2023, 10:11 Wow. 100million a year. Lets say it's half labour half materials. So that means 50 million Lab + OH. If the charge out rate is 100 GBP / hour then they're spending 500,000 hours per year, or 62,500 mandays. So they must have 312 people working fulltime on Puma without a break. Quite some facility
Clearly shows that delaying NMH is not cost free either.
- These users liked the author Poiuytrewq for the post (total 2):
- SD67 • serge750
- mrclark303
- Donator
- Posts: 853
- Joined: 06 May 2015, 10:47
Re: Puma Helicopter (RAF)
Gaffer tape and luck
- These users liked the author mrclark303 for the post:
- Jensy
Re: Puma Helicopter (RAF)
At this rate, we'll piss away the entire NMH budget keeping Puma in service.mrclark303 wrote: ↑07 Sep 2023, 14:13Gaffer tape and luck
There is something about this country and military helicopter procurement, since at least the 1980s, (and possibly going back to merging Bristol/Fairey/Westland in 1961) that just boggles the mind. Can't help but suspect corruption and politics at the root.
In the last couple of years alone:
- H135Ms bought but not needed - no clue if Gazelle will be replaced
- NMH delayed, repeatedly (with Griffin already gone
- Gold plated Chinooks that I'd dispute we need
- Puma now serving past its 60th birthday
- Wildcat HMA2 still waiting on Sea Venom
The further back you go the more ludicrous it gets.
- These users liked the author Jensy for the post (total 3):
- SD67 • serge750 • mrclark303
"Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room!" - Dr. Strangelove (1964)
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4101
- Joined: 15 Dec 2017, 10:25
Re: Puma Helicopter (RAF)
Completely agree.
This is something the previous DS just did not get to grips with and it should have been prioritised.
- These users liked the author Poiuytrewq for the post:
- mrclark303
Re: Puma Helicopter (RAF)
I get the impression that the army wants nothing to do with Westland. Hence AH64 coming direct from the US, NMH pushed into the long grass, Merlins turned over to the Navy, lots of Chinooks please
Ive got a mental image "I want real ARMY helicopters not those fiddly European Navy things, real armies fly American!" something like that